This is false, or course. Not only does the doctor not know if their patient is organ donor or not, if they do not work with the same urgency, they are risking their license for medicine. The doctor does not have access to this information because if there happened to be a serious accident, the knowledge could bias the doctor. This information could bias the doctor because if one his or her family members needed an organ, the doctor could pick their family over a patient and not work with the same urgency. For example, the doctor’s cousin could need a new heart, and if the doctor knew their patient was an organ donor, and they had the same blood type, the doctor could not work as hard to save the patient’s life because their cousin needs a heart. Also, if the doctor had this information, he could be more worried about saving lives on the transplant list rather than the patient’s. All in just one person’s body, up to 25 different organs and tissues can be donated after death. This could potentially be saving up to 25 different lives. So, this could leave the doctor in a moral dilemma: save one person, or save twenty-five