The Culture Industry: Enlightenment As Mass Deception

Words: 1065
Pages: 5

Robert Wilder Denholm
Professor Alison Trope, Ph.D
Comm 206: Communications and Culture
Due Date: 13th November 2015

The Culture Industry in Today’s Society

In “The Culture Industry: Enlightenment as Mass Deception” by Theodor W. Adorno and Max Horkheimer, they examine society and its involvement in the entertainment culture industry. With the entertainment industry being such a key role in our society, people want to be able to be in control of what is produced. But with big companies now in charge of everything, there has been a shift in the power, from the consumer to the producer. Demonstrated in their essay, Adorno and Horkheimer’s perspective on the culture industry is accurate to this day as it is the driving force in our society that
…show more content…
These different items are used to manipulate society into passivity. In the 21st century, mass media is such an influence in our society and it permeates our everyday lives. There is no such thing as freedom anymore because our lives are just constantly saturated with people telling us what to do and feeding us things. Producers are the ones with all the power. “A technological rationale is the rationale of domination itself. It is the coercive nature of society alienated from itself. Automobiles, bombs, and movies keep the whole thing together until their leveling element shows its strength in the very wrong which it furthered. It has made the technology of the culture industry no more than the achievement of standardization and mass production, sacrificing whatever involved a distinction between the logic of the work and that of the social system” (Adorno, Pg.4). While the culture industry acts as a producer with all the power, it also is a tool that help bind individuals. Humans are consumers, and no matter what their economic situations are, they are going to continue to fall under the easy pleasures that we like of popular …show more content…
Landscapes are constituted by ways of seeing, and if we know how to read them, then we can perceive in landscape representations the relations of power that underlie and constitute them. “Urban planners, real estate developers, and city officials work within the matrix of state institutions and local preferences. Both are neither free nor unfree from market forces and attachments of place” (Zukin, Pg. 42). Urban places respond to market pressures with people’s public dreams defined by private development projects and public pleasure the creative destruction. It is reflecting on an institutionalized reorientation of cultural patrons, producers, and consumers. The architects are the ones that are in control of society. In Adorno and Horkheimer’s eyes, the architect would be the producer that is holding all the power. They have the ability to shape how the city looks. For architects, architecture is their product, they see architecture as their mark on their city, and consumers don’t have a say in if they want it there or not. “We owe the clearest cultural map of structural change not to novelists or literary critics, but to architects and designers. Their products, their social roles as cultural producers, and the organization of consumption which they intervene create shifting landscapes in the most material sense” (Zukin, Pg.