Jason betraying Medea places Jason in a position of being both the victim and the perpetrator. In the beginning of the play …show more content…
Medea had lost everything for Jason “[she] [has] no city, no friend to show [her] pity when [she] [has] suffered suffering’s worst,” she is willing to sacrifice everything to make her revenge against Jason perfect. Euripides shows audiences that even though she would be considered crazy she if trying to deal with all the awful things that have happened to her, she feels that she has given Jason everything and has received nothing but betrayal in return. Medea massacres her own children, antithetically, to protect them from the counter-revenge of her enemies. Additionally, she also kills them to hurt Jason, in spite of murdering them she is sentencing herself to a life of remorse and grief. Euripides shows through Medea that the idea of perfect revenge is impossible, revenge is destructive for both the victim and the perpetrator. We are able to see this through Medea’s decision to slay her children and how conflicting the situation is for her, she may have gotten her revenge against Jason but she is still emotionally affected by the