The Ethics Of Domesticated Eating Animals

Words: 630
Pages: 3

There is a debate that has long been argued as it is very sensitive there are many sides to this debate. This debate is about the ethics of eating animals. In many societies, controversy and debate have been raised over the ethics of domesticated eating animals. The main ethical objection to eating domesticated animal meat that is not the standard is that for most people living in any of the developed countries in this world it is not necessary for their survival or health to eat any other meat rather than the standard beef, pork, chicken etc. “Meat is an animal flesh that in this context is eaten as food” however different countries have a different perspective on this statement. In many countries it is illegal to mix, sell meat that isn’t the standard meat however many other countries this different as many other countries see that anything that is edible and soothes hunger is considered fine to eat even if it does involve eating other meat. …show more content…
It is not a generally available food in some English-speaking countries as it illegal due to food standards. The horse is seen in most countries as a companion and a working animal in addition people living on farms or who own horses would never take something as valuable as a horse and kill it just for food as there are more important roles however most countries that are not developed see horse meat as both working animals and food. Since the developed countries have massive amounts of standard meat there would be no need for the horse to be seen as foods however in developing countries this is different, most developing countries are poorer. Horse meat is also considered taboo in most religions as many religions had abolished or outlawed eating horse meat in the