The Feminist Argument In 'Witness For The Prosecution'

Words: 915
Pages: 4

In this sophisticated comedy about the battle of the sexes, Amanda and Adam Bonner are an idyllic marriage of lawyers whose marital peace is affected when a case faces in court as a defender and prosecutor respectively: a woman is judged by shooting her husband and the lover of it. Adam does not doubt the guilt of the accused, but Amanda is not of the same opinion. It's a comedy agile and entertaining works as a feminist argument. It highlights the double patriarchal moral and privileged treatment accorded in practice in the courts of many countries the husband to "defend his honor" killing his unfaithful wife.
The film tells the story of a couple of marriages, one particular thing Judy Holiday and Tom Ewell, and the other that of Katharine Hepburn and Spencer Tracy. The argument is quite simple in principle; a woman (Judy Holiday) who fears losing her husband in the hands of another woman discovers
…show more content…
The case is forced, implausible, and poorly developed. The judge incurs incomprehensible attitudes, like many other characters, and everything is nothing more than a little amusing excuse for what really matters: the feminist discourse and situations between the famous couple. And we already know how it will end. That is, we are not in something like 'Witness for the Prosecution' in comic version, but in a conservative lucimiento vehicle. Nor is it much of a cinematic creation, although many are fill your mouth with these films, which are nothing more than filmed theater, calling them masterpieces and suchlike. Cukor simply put the camera and shoots the best possible way, without using the terms at any time and with a fully theatrical planning. That is, generally flat with actors usually profile. Still, it achieves a smooth and competent storytelling, but ten years after, for example, 'Gone with the Wind’, which is much more dynamic and more visual, as is outdated. The film evolves,