At the time, positive identification of the cultures had not yet been established, however we now know that artifacts then recovered belonged to the Early Woodland Adena culture (ca. 500 BC-AD200) and/ or Late Prehistoric Fort Ancient culture (ca. AD 1000-1650). Putnam was the first to conduct an excavation at the site of the Serpent mound through the years 1887- 1989. Though his excavations, he found no artifacts directly around or under the mound itself. However, about 200 miles southeast of the Serpent, he conducted his excavation further. There at the Conical mound , he discovered multiple burials and artifacts such as pottery. These goods were later analyzed by James B. Griffin in 1943 who assessed the grave goods to be from the Adena culture. Griffin had also analyzed materials found from a lower level nearby village site that place Fort Ancient culture nearby as well. Despite the fact that both cultures can be pinpointed in nearby areas, Griffin came to the conclusion that it was the Adena Culture that which origin can be attributed to, and for many years most researchers …show more content…
Ancient carvings found in a mississippian indian mound located in Cahokia, the largest city of the mississippian period, depict a woman stabbing a hoe into the back of the serpent. The tail of the snake splits in two and grows up her back as a squash plant with gourds grow from it. Archeologist believe that such imagery is evident that that indigenous mississippian culture used the snake as a symbol for fertility and the power the female holds. This representation makes evident that these people saw women playing an essential role in the creation of life through birth. As this snake symbolism represents fertility, the snake may also reference the fertility of crops as the two ends of the serpent's tale grows into a squash plant bearing