The Norris-Laguardia Act 2003: A Case Study

Words: 703
Pages: 3

parenthetical citations (in APA format) to reference your sources.

The impact of the RLA is that it established the right of employees in the railroad industry to form and bargain together through representatives of their own selecting. Therefore the law was limited to railway labor because of the central importance of rail transportation in the national economy.
The Norris-Laguardia Act of 1932 was the parliamentary the answer to inappropriate use of the restriction to stop strenuous activities by the courts. No longer could federal courts condone the conduct of organized labor, with the exception of where a considerable injury to possessions could be shown. Additionally, the act outlawed the use of yellow-dog employment contracts where an
…show more content…
Taft-Hartley regulated the economic activities of unions for the first time and prohibited the use of secondary boycotts and lengthy organizational picketing. There were no guidelines that governed the affiliation between the union supporters and their union. Demonstrated unethical union practices surpass affiliation rights through excessive union fees and members ‘voices not being heard under the union authority. The Landrum-Griffin Act revised a bill of rights for union members and required the disclosure of union fiscal activities. The NLRA and the provisions covering collective bargaining and unfair labor practices only govern the relationship between the union member and management. The act secured union unifying policies and disadvantaged employers of the economical weapons they had been utilized against unions, such as firing union organizers and …show more content…
The employer may not assist or dominate a labor organization, nor show preference to one labor organization over another. Employers may not discriminate in any way based on union membership, except that where a state selects, the union shop may be allowed, in which all newly hired employees may be required to join the union upon completing their probationary period.
The unfair labor practices incorporated restrictions on union activities under the Taft-Hartley revision. Unions cannot demand an employer take action against an employee for any reason except failure to pay union dues in a union-shop state. Unions are not allowed to encourage in employee strikes where the goal is to force an employer to recognize an uncertified labor organization or cease bargaining with one who is certified. Unions cannot force an employer to pay for services not provided–also known as sweetheart deals. Neither can unions use their power of collective labor to infringe upon the rights of management to engage in otherwise proper business as to do so would be a restraint of