The Pros And Cons Of Atomic Bombing

Words: 512

Pages: 3

Open Document

During world War Two the United States was faced with constant pressure from Japan and Germany regarding the recent conflicts that had taken place, they were not sure of how to effectively end the war in a quick and timely manner. Throughout history America has been known as the top economic and military superpower, and this time it would be no different. The bombings used to suppress the axis powers came under intense scrutiny mainly due in part to that there were surely alternative methods that could have been substituted for the bombing runs. possibly resulting in numerous lives saved on all sides of the conflict. There was no doubt that there were similar but safer ways to manage the engagement in the coming years, the question is what …show more content…
Through analyzing refreshed military doctrine and the rules of engagement during the time it is observed that there were abundant substitutes that could have been exploited to extinguish the developing opposition. The other significant courses of action consisted of but were not limited to, creating and presenting a demonstration to the emperor of Japan with hopes of persuading him to surrender, or by waiting on reinforcements to come from the Soviet Union… General Henry H. Arnold had this to say about the bombings of Hiroshima and Nagasaki, “It always appeared to us that, atomic bomb or no atomic bomb, the Japanese were already on the verge of collapse.” In some instances people could say that both of these specific bombings may have been racially motivated and could have been executed for the simple purpose of retaliation for the barbaric acts committed on both sides of the seemingly never-ending skirmish. Indicating the previous point, roughly at least more than half of the casualties in the separate battles proved to be civilians, such as the case in the bombings of Hiroshima and

The Pros And Cons Of Atomic Bombing

sides exemplified. Soldiers repeatedly raped civilian women while generals and other war officials used horrific tactics such as mass bombing and kamikaze attacks in order to undermine the enemy. One of the many bombings from World War II that comes into question is the U.S.A.’s use of nuclear bombing one the Japanese islands of Nagasaki and Hiroshima. While the bombing did shorten the war and saved lives from both sides, the results…

Words 978 - Pages 4

The Pros And Cons Of Atomic Bombing

On August 6, 1945, the United States bomber Enola Gay dropped an atomic bomb on the Japanese city of Hiroshima, on orders from President Harry S Truman. Three days later, another bomb was dropped on Nagasaki. Each bomb is estimated to have killed between 50,000 and 100,000 people (Powers, 1995, p. 20), but it is difficult to estimate the death toll. These bombings are widely believed to be the main reason for Japan’s surrender on September 2. In the end, the bombardment achieved the intended purpose…

Words 877 - Pages 4

The Pros And Cons Of Atomic Bombing

about the USA dropping an atomic bomb on Japan in two locations called Hiroshima and Nagasaki, leading to the surrender of Japan and ending WWII. The survivors of the bombs explain what happened: they got a cloth, soaked it with water and rushed it back to the people that were drying and the dying people would suck the moisture out of the cloth. She said that when the darkness fell, the people just stood on the hill stunned by what the US did. Tokimo narrates the atomic bombing experience to schoolchildren…

Words 269 - Pages 2

The Pros And Cons Of Atomic Bombing

Was dropping the atomic bombs really the only solution to making the Japanese surrender? Before the year that the bombing was announced, Japan and the U.S. constantly fought, pushing forward, and backward armies to keep land; which resulted in major casualties on both sides, and it only got worse. In April 1945, the U.S. invades Okinawa, but fighting back, Japan sinks 30 ships and kills 5,000 mariners; Okinawa cost the lives of 7,600 American marines and the Japanese 110,000 soldiers. After the battle…

Words 172 - Pages 1

Pros And Cons Of Atomic Bombing Persuasive Essay

Atomic Bomb Dropping Debate Did you know that Japan was actually a very peaceful and simple nation and they were very close to surrendering right before our racist president, Truman, dropped a bomb on them just to look good in front of Russia? Actually, all those, except one are, widely believed misconceptions and they are untrue. The bomb served justice to the awful war crimes committed by the Japanese. Additionally the atomic bombs dropped on Japan, actually saved millions of lives…

Words 1613 - Pages 7

Cicero's Argumentative Analysis

War is an interesting topic. People spend their lives studying wars, why they started, the aftermath, pros and cons of it. The real question is whether it is morally right or the devil’s work. This question has been asked time and time again and never has got a clear answer. The simple answer is yes war is morally right and there is real world examples to proof it. War is a way to settle a dispute when the peaceful option is no longer available. This idea has been known long before Cicero wrote…

Words 409 - Pages 2

Pros And Cons Of The Manhattan Project

The Manhattan Project This is what ended world war two. The Manhattan Project is the building of an atomic bomb. The two bombs were used on Hiroshima and Nagasaki. This will be on the progression of the Manhattan Project. Lets see how America got into this position. First Japan attacked Pearl Harbor. America had island-hopped to Japan. President Truman made the decision to drop the two bombs on Japan. This was a very controversial decision. This is how and when the Manhattan Project started. The…

Words 967 - Pages 4

The World War Essay

Bombing of Hiroshima and Nagasaki Micole Caasalan History 20 Period 1 Mr. Lepage April 15, 2014 The horrors of a bombing of Hiroshima and Nagasaki are unimaginable. To be able countries fight with nuclear weapons. A nuclear war has never happened, but because nuclear weapons are extremely powerful and could cause destruction throughout the world, even a small nuclear weapon has enough potential…

Words 569 - Pages 3

Rick Atkinson World War Two Analysis

Nevertheless, it is without question that whatever the reason may be for war, it is all factored by fear. For instance, “ But then the bombing of Nagasaki had demonstrated otherwise, and a lie told by a downed American pilot convinced War Minister Korechika Anami that the Americans had as many as a hundred bombs. (The official scientific report confirming the bomb was atomic arrived at Imperial Headquarters on the 10th). Even so, hours of meetings and debates lasting well into the early morning hours of…

Words 833 - Pages 4

Weapons of Destruction Essay

controlled flight. It lasted twelve seconds”(Weir 154). The plane flew seven miles per hour. Years later the Blackbird could fly 2189 mph at an altitude 86000 ft (154). The airplane did prove itself to be a mater weapon in the sea and on land. Most of the bombing strategy that they used with the planes, was a wasted effort (156). Airplanes will always become more and more advanced in today society. In different wars, chemical warfare was used in many ways. It can be a very dangerous weapon if used correctly…

Words 623 - Pages 3