Aligned more-so with the modern era’s welcoming standpoint on immigrants, this side seeks to create a melting pot society within the United States, free of stringent policies and regulations. Common arguments made by those who share this way of thinking are that immigrants perform manual labor, strengthen population growth, and help to end racial tensions. Additionally, those in support of this standpoint argue that there has already been immigration precedence set, as the original colonists were undocumented themselves. While critics often argue that this side of the debate is too relaxed on actual policies concerning immigration, this is simply not the case. See, it is important to note that this side of the argument seeks to not only open the border to more citizens, but to also reform the current laws. Supporters of this end of the spectrum include Reyna Grande, as she herself had to deal with the reality of being an undocumented citizen. “Where do I belong…do I belong here? Do I belong there? Do I belong anywhere?” (Grande 175). Pro-immigration supports seek to end doubt such as Reyna Grande’s by utilizing policies that create an inclusive society, rather than un-including large swathes of …show more content…
Key in establishing policies, and successfully passing reforms, both the House of Representatives and the Senate are necessary in helping to alleviate the struggles of undocumented citizens. However, this is also wherein the greatest downfall lies. Caught between both sides of the immigration debate, congress has been forced into a standstill induced by fear. As drawn in picture E, neither party within congress can afford to reform immigration, as they will either lose votes or be succumbed to gridlock. This directly leads to sorrowful stories such as those written by author Reyna Grande, or the millions of “illegal citizens” residing within the United States. In order for actual change to occur, it is vital that congress reverses its tradition of partisanship, and begins to fight for the proper treatment of all. If not, congressmen will constantly be struggling to please both sides of this debate, which defaults into stagnant policy