The biggest argument made by the author was that jurors stand no chance against someone who has confessed to a crime, no matter if the person was incoherent or not at the time of the confession because it is so hard to tell if it is actually real or fake. Kassin and coworker Katherine Neumann conducted an …show more content…
During his interrogation he was asked multiple questions he could not answer on his own but the police would tell him what he did and then he would repeat it as if he was confessing to the crime. Some of the things that can contribute to a false confession during an interrogation are, duress, mental impairment, fear of violence, the threat of a harsh sentence, intoxication, and hypnosis. These factors can have a huge impact on a person who is being questioned. So much so that the person actually starts to believe it is true and then finally confesses to the