Warwick describes the specialization factor as the ‘hypersphere’; a description of the species’ function. This is comparable to the biological niche. “In a one-dimensional, IQ, sense it can be said that the mean level is changing. In terms of the multidimensional hypersphere of intelligence, it is the origin or central point of the hypersphere that moves.” (Warwick 206). IQ falls short when compared to the potential of using the hypersphere model and the sociological imagination. Warwick defines the hypersphere model as a multidimensional derivation of intelligence. “Using the hypersphere model, each individual’s intelligence can be characterized by how they perform on the wide range of axes which represent the different aspects of their intelligence.” (Warwick 210). The hypersphere model is a representation of the idea of taking a vast number of contexts and circumstances into account. In order to realize the hypersphere, the full function of the organism and its complete ‘place’ in the grand scheme of things must be known and understood. This method is mostly speculative and Warwick does not offer a realistic method of measurement, but his suggestion of a much more thorough examination allows for an opening for Flynn’s suggestion. “Some of the examples are important and some idiosyncratic. But a common thread runs through all of them: failure of the sociological imagination.” (Flynn 181). Flynn recognizes the merit of having the hyperspace model because he see the vast amount of variables needed in order to even define intelligence. After he establishes his recognition of the flawed nature of the IQ measurement, Flynn suggests that the only thing that is missing is the sociological imagination. The sociological imagination and the hypersphere are very