Farrar Jr. for the American Academy of Political and Social Science. Farrar focuses less on explaining the division of branches causing Britain’s skewed intelligence picture but still concludes that, that the competing intelligence factions were a main source of problems from the time period. Farrar does well summarizing the book in a way that does not simply go through the book chapter by chapter. He includes various quotes from Wark that help convey key ideas throughout The Ultimate Enemy. Farrar adds more of his view and the theme he found regarding Britain’s appeasement, than Gollin does in the previous review. He attempts to sum the main point into one sentence, saying, “since appeasement failed, intelligence failed.” Farrar does touch more on the notion that even if the intelligence was gathered in a more effective way that Britain’s preconceptions about Germany may not have been overturn. He ends his review by introducing the idea that even with better intelligence, the British appeasement may have been the best route, instead of taking Germany to war before they had built up their military