The Value Of Debate Rhetorical Analysis

Words: 960

Pages: 4

Open Document

Mercy Hammond

Professor Briscoe

Oral Communications

22 April 2024

General Purpose: to persuade.

Specific Purpose: To persuade the audience that conflict, disagreement, and arguing strengthen connection and closeness in relationships rather than creating division.

Central Idea: Arguing or expressing opposite points of view can lead to deeper understanding and acceptance between people, fostering individual open mindedness, and growing or changing perspectives.

Introduction:

In Jeffery Parcher’s article The Value of Debate, he points out that, “The creation of an argument is one of the most complex cognitive acts that a person can engage in.” In his article, “The Value of Debate” is

Arguing requires an individual to demonstrate a mastery …show more content…
Body:..

Arguing in a productive way leads to a deeper understanding of our differences.

Transition: But how does one engage in this kind of dialogue in a productive manner?

In an article on the University of Mississippi’s counseling center page, the author discusses the importance of not avoiding conflict but embracing it in a healthy way. There are three primary “conflict styles” a person uses to deal with a dispute.

The Mad Bomber expresses anger openly but with minimal control over their own emotions and rationality.

The Smolderer harbors resentment by holding disagreements inside, but only expressing them passively rather than openly.

The Fair Fighter expresses specific concerns while avoiding accusation, generalization, and attacking areas of personal sensitivity.

By listening in a calm manner, even if we do not necessarily agree, we create a safe space for each person to be vulnerable and honest, which are the key ingredients in genuine connection. We cannot fully appreciate someone until we have tried to love each other, even the ones we do not

Essay Critical Thinking

Critical Thinking Catherine Brinner April 9, 2012 Abstract The challenge for critical thinking instruction lies not in convincing people of its value but in developing a model of what to teach and how to teach it. Toulmin's model provides a useful framework for students to examine the ability of an argument to justify rather than prove a point. Utilizing this model can make critical thinking the very means by which students construct knowledge. Critical Thinking Debating, questioning, analyzing…

Words 1185 - Pages 5

1105333226 2004 English Advanced Notes Hussain Essay

the relatives of loved ones, soldiers, influential state governors whose support he needed, large crowd of ordinary citizens many of whom were bereaved by the war, other spectators and media also today’s wider American audience who pride in their values and beliefs. Lincoln places himself historically in his following commencing paragraph, ‘four score and seven years ago’ as this is the only fact that he states throughout, the rest of his address is primarily idealistic. The fact along with ‘our’…

Words 7927 - Pages 32

Heterodox Economics And The History Of Economic Thought

D’Ippoliti and Alessandro Roncaglia This is probably all one can ask of history, and of the history of ideas in particular: not to resolve issues, but to raise the level of the debate. (Hirschman 1977, 135) The declining role of the history of economic thought (HET) in university research and teaching has been increasingly under debate. Many historians often recall the relationship between HET and heterodox economics (HEC), considering it as a strength of HET and/or one of the reasons for its damnation…

Words 8158 - Pages 33

Discourse Analysis

Discourse analysis helps to understand language and social meanings in a meaningful way. It helps to understand the way in which discourse constructs the legitimacy and meaning of social and political developments. Discourse includes corpus of concepts, ideas and all possible sets of social interactions through which meanings take birth in societal interaction and help make sense of any given phenomenon (Halperin and Heath…

Words 2758 - Pages 12

How to Write an Argumentative Essay in 9 Easy Steps

beliefs interact with one another every day (or just bump heads). Your essay, even if it is about the past, should connect to values and ideas of the present. Look to current events or issues for inspiration—what’s going on in the world that’s inspiring discussion and/or disagreement? Ask yourself: does my topic matter to people right now? Why? •Your topic must have value to you. Given the hours you’ll need to invest in the paper, your topic needs to be more than “interesting”; it has to be knowledge…

Words 1330 - Pages 6

Critical Perspective In Accounting

“no access to reality other than through structures of representation” (Robson, 1992, p. 690). One such “structure of representation” is metaphor. Critical examination of accounting knowledge should involve “not only the employment of literary, rhetorical and discursive analyses, but require[s] interpretation of the . . . consequences that ﬂow from the operation of . . . metaphors” (Robson, 1992, pp. 703–4). ∗ Corresponding author. E-mail address: Amernic@rotman.utoronto.ca (J. Amernic). 1045-2354/$…

Words 7091 - Pages 29

Essay on C2 Skeggs Bourdieu Intro

Introducing Pierre Bourdieu’s Analysis of Class, Gender and Sexuality Beverley Skeggs (from L.Adkins & B.Skeggs (2005) Feminism After Bourdieu. Oxford. Blackwell. Pierre Bourdieu died in January 2002, leaving a huge legacy of work, across a range of topics and disciplines. Although institutionally established as professor of sociology at the prestigious College de France his first substantive research was anthropological – on the Kabliya in Algeria (The Algerians 1958)1. From this he developed…

Words 7453 - Pages 30

Essay on Shhh

Crystal’s “2B or not 2B” Due: End of class period, Wednesday, June 13th Percentage of Final Grade: 10% Objective: Write a summary of Crystal’s essay “2B or not 2B.” Use a template from They Say, I Say to begin your summary. Make appropriate rhetorical “moves,” such as integrating quotes, choosing strong verbs, and using effective transitions. Most importantly, demonstrate that you understand the what, how, and why: (1) What is the main argument or “gist” of Crystal’s essay? (2) How does Crystal…

Words 2150 - Pages 9

Standardization And Objectivity Analysis

standardization can create conflicts between different standards of measures but eventually creates universality which is more desirable. Progress of science is histories of formal objectivity. Standardization can be reduced due to challenges if the rhetorical situation is such. Sismondo argues that formal rules cannot eliminate individual judgment and are not as big a constraint as the proponents of objectivity claim. They rather create space for interpretation and formal rules cannot replace expertise…

Words 2805 - Pages 12

Example Research: Critical Discourse Analysis Essay

18 Critical Discourse Analysis TEUN A. VAN DIJK 0 Introduction: What Is Critical Discourse Analysis? Critical discourse analysis (CDA) is a type of discourse analytical research that primarily studies the way social power abuse, dominance, and inequality are enacted, reproduced, and resisted by text and talk in the social and political context. With such dissident research, critical discourse analysts take explicit position, and thus want to understand, expose, and ultimately resist social inequality…

Words 9518 - Pages 39