The Virginia And Kentucky Resolutions Reconsidered Summary

Within K. R. Constantine Gutzman’s journal, The Virginia and Kentucky Resolutions Reconsidered: An Appeal to the Real Laws of Our Country, it is addressed that the Virginia and Kentucky Resolutions of 1798 were thought to be the “touchstone of Virginia’s constitutionalism.” However, many historians considered the Kentucky Resolutions to be quite controversial during the first resolution but Virginia Republicans did not consider them to be controversial what so ever. This document allows the provisions of the resolutions to be made simple in order to perceive the real laws of the country. It is through Gutzman’s journal that one can better understand the journey of passing the resolutions and why they were rightfully designed, which was to appeal the federal government because it did not possess the authority to exercise power not specifically delegated to it in the Constitution.
K. R. Constantine Gutzman's piece of work was created in 2000 but contains information dating back the beginning of the resolutions. It addresses the most influential as well as the impotent individuals that contributed in making or impairing the Kentucky Resolutions. As the author …show more content…
It is clear that in response to the federal government Thomas Jefferson and James Madison joined together in order to devise a constitutional doctrines helpful and useful for defense of civil liberties that led to many victories for the Federalist in federal politics, despite the decade of political defeats. Gutzman states that evidence of Jefferson’s having long held views similar to those that he had Kentucky adopt in 1798 can be found in his earliest political writings. Which goes to show that the fight for state rights has been held to some importance for quite sometime by

Show More

The Virginia And Kentucky Resolutions Reconsidered Summary

Related Documents: The Virginia And Kentucky Resolutions Reconsidered Summary

Managing Information Technology (7th Edition) Essay