Susan Anderson, a critic who wrote a critical review on Marquez’s story “The Woman Who Came at Six O’Clock”, explores the possible implications of this story and the Marquez’s exploration in manipulating how his work is perceived. Anderson’s main point is that Marquez is “experimenting with the use of time, signaling his interest in having realistic situations coexist alongside an invented reality in which time is nonlinear”, through how his two characters interact with each other and the meaning behind their words. In Anderson’s article, she claims that Marquez is trying to manipulate time and the reality that traps them. Examples of such are seen throughout the story. Marquez supports Anderson’s claims through showing the prostitute asking Jose if he would lie for her by saying she was in the restaurant earlier than her normal time. Jose’s response is the interesting part. He is absolutely in love with the prostitute and wishes she would discontinue her “profession”. He is stuck in his own reality that she would
Greenstreet 2 …show more content…
The prostitute, on the other hand, is seemingly guilty of having committed a homicide of a client. Her fantasy is trying to get out of the town and start over. Somewhere where men can’t be hurtful. Her reality that she is stuck in is that she could be found guilty of murder and end up in prison. Both Jose and the prostitute have dreams yet they are both stuck in their realities, Jose being in love with a woman who mocks him even when he cooks her his best steak for free, and a prostitute who has committed murder. Their being polar opposites keeps them wandering in a fantasy that will never come to