The wrongdoer identity problem states that it would be morally wrong to get Serbia to pay higher taxes, as they were the victims since the wrongdoer will not confess their mistakes, ultimately refraining from compensating for their faults. Furthermore in connection to the victim/claimant identity problem, one must differentiate between the person who has been injured (victim) and the individual who has initiated the injury (Posner, and Sunstein, 1595). If the money for the compensation is given, it would be placed into the Bosnian national account, this is completely absurd as they weren’t the victims of the genocide and would create problems in political decision-making when it comes to the negotiations. Lastly, the adequately constructed moral theory was the culpability problem in terms of the Bosnia-Serbia conflict. It is considered morally wrong, since the atrocity complies with the different types of negligence’s; negligence in general, government negligence and lastly the government versus the public. Acting in accordance with the three types of negligence, would definitely lead to problems in negotiations and in political decision-