Bruno doesn't know or understand the tragedy he is living in the middle of. He doesn't understand the significance of who he sees behind the fences of the concentration camp. In the descriptions of Bruno's thinking it is visible how he does not lose innocence through experience. An example of this is when Bruno questions the power of those around him, “What exactly was the difference?... And who decided which people wore the striped pyjamas and which people wore the uniforms?”. (Narrator, ) Another example of this is the way Bruno views human beings, “In his heart, he knew there was no reason to be impolite to someone, even if they did work for you. There was such a thing as manners after all.” (Narrator, )
The author uses the theme of innocence as one strong enough to withstand the …show more content…
His innocence and naivety of the situation is clear when he makes the comment, “My dad’s a solider, but not the sort that takes people's clothes away.” Another example of his naivety to the circumstances is when he is unsure to what his father meant by when he said the people in Out-With are “not people at all.” In the last chapters when he is inevitably going to meet his fate, marching with other prisoners, "he wanted to whisper to them that everything was all right, that Father was the Commandant, and if this was the kind of thing that he wanted the people to do then it must be all right” (Narrator, 210). The one person he believed in. The one person he thought wouldn't do anything to these people. Was going to bring death upon the Jew’s around him and many, many more others, but Bruno's innocence hinders him from understanding the tragedy that surrounds