Both stories contained a brief summary on what their life was like. In chapter 1, Frederick Douglass was telling us how he didn't know much about who he was. All he knew was his name and that his mom gave him up, and had died a little bit later. The slave girl knew her history of who she was and where she came from, she just left her family to support them. Then got taken for granted by the people she was with, kinda like Douglass. At the end of the day they were both living in confusion in which they could not control.
The “Life of Frederick Douglass” and the “Slave Girl in California” …show more content…
The slave girl was more of a maid to the family she helped take care of. But, the way they made her do things and how they made her live her life you would look at it like she was practically a slave. She couldn’t react to the way she was being treated because it would’ve just made things worse just if Frederick would’ve did his own thing or talked back he would have had consequences. This is telling us that no matter what someone always has it worse.
Even though these stories have similar themes they both have different ones too. The “Life of Frederick Douglass” and the “Slave Girl in California” both give us in great detail that they were not treated like a person should be treated. Since they were both practically treated as animals, and Frederick couldn't learn anything as if it was a rule… the slave girl couldn't sleep in a bed as if it was a rule. Therefore both of them basically had their rights taken away, at the time Frederick didn’t have any rights because of his color which makes it worse, the slave girl had rights but was treated as if she had