Tilted Arc Case Study

Words: 605
Pages: 3

A well-known artist name Richard Serra designed and constructed the Tilted Arc to be a site specific piece of art work which could not be moved unless losing its value. However the Tilted Arc function stirred up a whole lot of conflict simply because of its position to being installed in front of the Foley Square Federal Building. For example the Tilted Arc purpose was a solid plate of unfinished cor-ten steel. As named “tilted” Serra’s piece of work sat tilted in adjacent to the building where a viewer can become aware of their self and their own movement throughout the plaza. As explained with each step by the viewer of the tilted Arc, not only does perception change but the whole environment around does too as well. Moving forward objections …show more content…
A little later after the commission of the Tilted Arc, the piece of work had attracted a negative feedback on behave of the employees who work in the area. They felt as though the Tilted Arc was very disruptive to their daily routine of work and within months they sought through to signing a petition for its removal. Therefor Serra’s piece of work then begin to blow up as its controversy of removal led to its demise. For example the trial involving the Tilted Arc was cited as the most Notorious public sculpture Controversy in the history of law. So as the trial worked on removing the exposure of the full physical piece. The Tilted Arc just gain value in high demand for any known art work. March 15, 1989 a jury of five voted 4 to 1 in the removal of the Tilted Arc sculpture and it had then been removed! But however in the next year the enactment of the Visual Artists Rights Act (VARA) in 1990 was the act of “moral rights” due to the rights of professional Artist and their art work. The VARA had supported Richard Serra later in years and especially in the late 90’s but however Serra did not approve of the sculpture return unless it was to be placed in the exact same spot as