Timothy Mcveigh's Oklahoma City Bombing

Words: 1080
Pages: 5

On April 19, 1995, many people started their day as normal, went to work as normal, and dropped their kids off at school as normal. However, for some, it would be the last day that anything was ever normal again. This was all thanks to one man--Timothy McVeigh. He caused countless tears and broken hearts for numerous Oklahomans and other people around the country. Because McVeigh’s actions were very impactful for Oklahoman’s, the trial should have been held in Oklahoma.
McVeigh grew up in Texas and had a tough childhood. In school, he was called “Chicken McVeigh,” and his mom moved to Florida, leaving him and his family (Thomas). This left him angry and bitter about life. Later on in his life, he developed an interest in guns and became a
…show more content…
Shari Mycek said, “More than two years after the horrific bombing of the Alfred P. Murrah Federal Building, lingering signs of the devastation are still present…I don’t think people will ever get over this” (Mycek 20). Days following the bombing and even today, people place sincere items along the fence of the memorial to show their respect and sorrow for the ones lost on April 19, 1995 (Mycek 20-21). Professionals in mental health report that the attack in Oklahoma City will “affect the community for many years to come” …show more content…
An article from People magazine reported six of the twenty-one kids from the building survived that horrible day, and they “do still bear its scars, both physical and emotional” (Truesdell 52). Some survivors have reported that they will never overcome it (Truesdell 52). P.J. Allen, a survivor from the daycare, said, “‘The bombing affected us all, and we can’t forget that’” (Truesdell 53). Many of the people directly affected by that day think of themselves privileged to still be living (Truesdell 53). Nekia, four years old at the time of the bombing, was drastically changed physically by April 19 (Truesdell 54). April 19 resulted in a month long coma for Nekia whom is now “‘at the level of a 6 or 7 year old’” (Truesdell