To What Extent Should Assault Weapons Be Banned Essay

Words: 1822
Pages: 8

Then, ‘’The only use for assault weapons is to shoot people,’" Agnos told the Assembly Public Safety Committee in June 1985. San Jose Police Chief Joseph McNamara concurred. "These are weapons of war," he said. They are made to kill people, and they are all over California. There is no legitimate use for these"(Sullum). Assault weapons can only be used for one thing and that thing is killing a living thing. The guns are made for military use, and they are extremely powerful and precise with quick ammunition firing rates ("Assault Weapons"). Somehow these guns are still allowed to common people who aren’t fighting any wars where they need these types of weapons. Assault weapons should be banned because they are used to increase mass shooting …show more content…
When a mass shooting occurs there are usually many deaths, and these articles describe the weapons that the shooter used and how many deaths happened. Overall, there have been hundreds of deaths from mass shootings that could have been prevented if the U.S. just banned assault weapons. The Gun Violence Archive found out that, “By the time of the Lewiston attack, the Gun Violence Archive, a group that tracks data involving firearms deaths, reported, more than 560 shootings in which four or more people were either injured or killed from being shot had taken place in the United States-more than days that had passed in the year” ("Assault Weapons"). Most of those deaths were likely from assault weapons because of how much more damage and the faster bullets that assault weapons have over normal self-defense weapons. The deaths would have been substantially reduced, or possibly would not have happened if assault weapons were banned throughout the country. In a different mass shooting, a man named Huberty drove to a McDonald's to shoot citizens with 3 different guns, and he used two assault weapons to go through with shooting 40 people with a little more than half dying