Torture In America Pros And Cons

Words: 986
Pages: 4

The government has different branches, the CIA being an extremely important one because of the work it does not only inside the U.S but outside of the country as well. Torture methods have been used for years, but it’s a topic American society tends to shy away from because we don’t see it happening with our own eyes and we dismiss it. But do we as the people who compose of the U.S. deserve to know how these detainees are being treated? Torture has torn through additional restraints since I first tried to get a grip on it (Shue 1978). The immoral torturers seem to happen in Shah’s Iran, Marcos’s Philippines, South Korea and Latin America, including Chile, Argentina, Brazil and Guatemala. Many of us thought that” torture was being practiced …show more content…
Much of the research was solely based on human experimentation:
“from 1953 to 1963, MKUltra and allied projects dispensed $25 million for human experiments by 185 nongovernmental researchers at eighty institutions, including forty-four universities and twelve hospitals” (ibid.: 29). Direct and indirect CIA contracts were sent to universities including known psychologists. Additional research was being done while the war in Vietnam was occurring as part of the Phoenix programme (and others) where, in McCoy’s sarcastic words, there was “a limitless supply of human subjects” (ibid.: 65).
In 1963, the CIA refined their Kubark Counterintelligence Interroga­tion handbook. Throughout the forty years, the Kubark manual would not only define but also advance and be of an example to other agency interrogation methods and training programs throughout the Third World. Incorporating the behavioral research done by contract academics, the manual revealed a new form of torture that was based on sensory deprivation and “self-inflicted” pain for an effect that, for the first time in the two millenia of this cruel science, was more psychological than physical. (Ibid.: