Course:
Professor:
Date:
Toulmin Model Analysis
Stephen Toulmin, a philosopher, developed Toulim Model as a method for analyzing a persuasive argument. There are five parts of the model, namely: claim, backing, warrant, qualifier, ground and rebuttal. A claim represents the statement that needs to be accepted as true. Grounds entail the actual persuasion using data, facts, and some reasoning skills. Warrant combines data and other grounds to defend a claim. Backing offers support to the warrant and provides answers to questions. Qualifier shows the strength of the leap from the data to the warrant. Rebuttal deals with counter-arguments to the claim (“Toulmin's Argument Model.”). Analysis of ‘Can a Playground Be Too Safe?’ using Toulim …show more content…
Mr. Stern affirms that in his childhood he would climb up to the monkey bars in Fort Tryon Park. Besides, Orkidia Rojas encourages her child to climb higher on the unfamiliar equipment (Tierney).
Dr. Sandseter says that exposure of children to more dangers on the playgrounds helps them to develop a habituation technique used to conquer phobias. According to the journal of evolutionally psychology 24, risky plays reflects cognitive behavior therapy, which leads to the evolution of children who seek thriller with zeal. Consequently, deaths are encountered when some young children are exposed to the threats and dangers on playgrounds (Tierney).
In brief, Toulmin Model seeks to analyze a persuasive argument. Parts such as claim, grounds, warrant, backing, qualifier and rebuttal together give shape to the method of persuasive argument. In the case of ‘Can a Playground Be Too Safe?’, various individuals show support for playgrounds with no safety measures. Safeguarded playgrounds lead to long-term injuries as opposed to unsafe playgrounds that cause harmless injuries. Finally, children need to be encouraged to play on the field with no precautions in order to overcome fear, encounter risks, reduce psychopathology and develop a sense of mastery.
Works