Theatre companies would add these extra alterations, such as the use of bloodhounds, in order to persuade individuals to attend their performances and to intrigue their audiences. For example, one “company tried real bloodhounds but…they looked too innocent and peaceful”; therefore, the director proceeded to “standardize the fiery Danes…and called them bloodhounds” (614). In general, most drama organizations alter the events and plot of Stowe’s Uncle Tom’s Cabin to produce more profit and captivate their viewers. Even actors and actresses, “who played in Tom shows, as they were termed professionally, did not usually boast about it in their reminiscences” because the productions veer so far from the book itself (615). Additionally, the strangest abomination of Uncle Tom’s Cabin “was the introduction of…two actors playing the same role, appear[ing] on the stage at the same time” (616). This …show more content…
Conway’s version of Stowe’s classic book. In particular, the New York Daily Times focuses on Eva, describing her as “the exquisite character of little Eva… amounts to nothing” in the Conway’s interpretation (604). In contrast, Stowe describes Eva as “the perfection of childish beauty…a mythic and allegorical being” (188). Clearly, the theatrical productions do not coincide with the text present in Uncle
Tom’s Cabin and do not correctly portray important characters in the novel. Additionally,
Conway alters the scene of the slave auction so much that “its point and moral [were] totally extinguished by converting its close into a ridiculous squabble, and ending it amid shouts of laughter” (605). Therefore, not only did some companies change the content of