United States V. Windsor Case Analysis

Words: 491
Pages: 2

In 2013, it was becoming more culturally acceptable to be gay, than it had been in the past. The shift in culture lead to a push for LGBT rights. This was shown through polls and elections. By the time the Supreme Court took the United States v. Windsor case, the majority of the public felt that it was time for equal rights for LGBT people.
By the time of the United States v Windsor case in 2013, the public was very much in favor of granting equal rights to LGBT people.(1) Polls from this time show a steady increase in support of LGBT rights, leading up to a majority of support. (1) This case was controversial because Supreme Court Justice Roberts had an important decision to make.(1) If he voted to continue to uphold the Defense of Marriage Act, and not granted legal benefits to same-sex couples who were already married, his decision would upset the majority of
…show more content…
Windsor case, the Republican party was the biggest opposition to LGBT rights. The Republican party was made up mostly of Conservatives during this time.(2) The Democrats however, were in favor of LGBT rights.(2) The Democrats thought that LGBT couples should have the same legal rights as hetereosexual couples. They were also in favor of legalizing same sex marriage nationwide.(2) Supreme Court decisions are made by Justices who are appointed by the president. (2) The president usually selects someone whose beliefs align with those of the president. (2) Since the Supreme Court Justice interprets the Constitution based off of his or her beliefs, the fact that there was a Democratic President and a Democratic majority in the house was a definitely an influence on the Supreme Court’s decision regarding the United States v Windsor case. (1) The people are the ones who elect the government officials through voting. This means that the majority of the American people in 2013 wanted a change and wanted LGBT couples to have the same legal rights as hetereosexual couples.