Usa-Patriot Act 9/11 Summary

Words: 1254
Pages: 6

Chapter Six overviews the USA-Patriot Act, the 9/11 Commission Report, National Security Letters, The Attorney General FBI Guidelines, the Homeland Security, and the Intelligence Reform and Terrorism Prevention Act. This reading shows the errors of the U.S. in terror situations as well as the conflict between the executive and legislative branches of the government. Learned from this reading is cooperation between agencies that may have prevented incidents, a better understanding of the law, and more teamwork between agencies.
The USA-Patriot Act-9/11 Commission report This reading illustrates events occurring up to the 9/11/2001 tragedy of the World Trade Center Towers. Numerous warnings and reports sent the surveillance services of the
…show more content…
to get personal information from third parties in cases involving national security. The NSL letters received extreme scrutiny as they gave the F.B.I. high authority to obtain an individual’s financial information as well as financial institution information. The NSLs, although reviewed and changed in 2005, required detailed examination by the Department of Justice. The F.B.I. enjoyed the far-reaching authority to gather information on foreign agents and some citizens. Approximately 22% of investigative case files had errors on investigative guidelines. Later on, NSLs were declared unconstitutional as they violated First Amendment …show more content…
abuses of power prohibiting investigations based on peaceful events and speech were banned. The Guidelines also curtailed and prevented tactics discrediting individuals as well as those participating in protected First Amendment Activities. These guidelines, adjusted later to accommodate domestic terrorism, replaced the “specific articulable facts” with “full reasonable standard” to enable full investigations. In 2002, Attorney General Ashcroft did away with the “facts or circumstances of crimes” regarding Internet material. He gave the F.B.I. ability more flexibility to obtain material using online searches and through public or nonprofit sites. Solove comments the F.B.I. should be under legislative control. He also argues that executive orders are not enforceable in a court of law, but if F.B.I. internal regulations are put into the Code; they would be more enforceable. (Foreign Intelligence Gathering, 2015, p. 191). Other regulating resources include the Homeland Security and the Intelligence Reform and Terrorism