Vaccination Argumentative Analysis

Words: 808
Pages: 4

Vaccines have been a subject of controversy for many years. People argue that they are absolutely necessary because they can prevent young children from deadly diseases that may put their life in jeopardy. The opposition declares that the vaccines still put the life of a child regardless due to the fact that the medication gives people additional defects that may prove to be even more lethal. This argument has persisted for a long time, but vaccinations have proven to be most effective in saving the lives of children and their peers. The consequences against unvaccinated children have been quite tragic. Many children have been prohibited from attending school just because of the fact that their parent(s) was too ignorant to have their baby injected at such a young age. Laws in North Carolina, Ohio, and New …show more content…
The opposition claims that unknown side effects have resulted in some children having additional diseases or defects that end up changing the child’s life. Some of these deficiencies include Autism and Thimerosal, in addition to others. In the article “Should Vaccines be Required for Children?” from ProCon.org, it reads, “ (anti-vaccination supporters claim that) children’s immune systems can deal with most infections naturally, and that injecting questionable vaccine ingredients into a child may cause side effects, including seizures, paralysis, and death. They contend that numerous studies prove that vaccines may trigger problems like autism, ADHD, and diabetes.” The faulty allegations have led to parents worldwide boycotting the vaccinations, and ultimately putting their child at risk for diseases that can lead to death. The overall chances of actually acquiring a defect as a result of vaccinations is slim to none, but in contrast, the vaccinations prove to do a world of good, providing immunization and good health for people