Vindication Of The Rights Of Woman Analysis

Words: 977
Pages: 4

Is it not amazing how men and women can be considered so different, yet be so similar? Human nature is what separates us from the animals and other creations because of our ability to reason. Human nature is that which makes us distinctly human-our biology, feelings, and behaviors. However, women during the Early Modern and Enlightenment periods struggled with the concept of human nature. Throughout these times, women were considered to be less than men, which brought some very brilliant women to question the so-called differences between male and female human nature. Women such as, Margaret Fell and Mary Wollstonecraft were faced with the same questions, though they thought these things in completely different time periods. Margaret Fell, …show more content…
One of Wollstonecraft's huge points was that human nature has no gender, so she argued that it does not make men and women different; women just needed to be challenged with independence in order to come into their own. According to Wollstonecraft, women are more than a mother or wife, they just need to be able to choose it for themselves. If women choose to be challenged by being independent, it will give them an equal experience as that of a man. She goes on to say that men and women's different biological roles have nothing to do with social roles, it is how women were being educated and convinced that they were supposed to have a domestic responsibility. If women are raised to be mothers and wives, then that is all they will ever be. In order to be more than what they are made out to be, women have to be challenged by self-rule and self-determination to think differently about their existence. So, Mary Wollstonecraft concludes that human nature is not what made women different from men, instead, it is how women were socialized to