Violent Civil Disobedience

Words: 567
Pages: 3
Open Document
Everyone views the world differently.Peaceful resistance to laws positively impact a free society because the people do not get physically harmed and the others can voice their opinions. To begin, peaceful resistance to laws lead to freedom of action and speech. For example, when Muhammad Ali did not agree to join United States Military, many US citizens found that offensive and did not support his decision on the other hand, Muhammad Ali believed that he was doing the right thing. He thought it was not right to "drop bombs and bullets on other innocent brown people," meaning Muhammad Ali did not support the idea of killing innocent people for the good of his country. He viewed the protection of US differently than some citizens and …show more content…
At that time the laws were not fair and inequality was a major problem. Gandhi said, "Civil disobedience becomes a sacred duty when the state becomes lawless or corrupt." This means that Gandhi and the other Indians thought that the state laws were unjust and were corrupted so they decided to take an action. While the Britishers followed the laws as they were satisfied with the laws. The Indians did not use any violence acts, they just boycotted British goods and did not follow the laws. The civil disobedience did create a lot of problems in India and bothered many British citizens, but this was the road which led the Indians to independence. When the Indians stood up against the authorities and laws they thought were unjust, they started voicing their opinions which led them to independence and it also inspired movements for civil rights and freedom across the world. There were no violent acts from the Indian side still they made their way through and got independence. This is an great example for minorities who want to speak up against their authorities about something they do not agree with and find offensive. Not following civil laws is not always a bad thing sometimes the outcome leaves everyone astonished and leads to
Show More

Related Documents: Violent Civil Disobedience

Civil Disobedience

To fully understand the meaning of civil disobedience first we would have to say that the meaning of civil disobedience is the denial to obey certain laws or pay taxes and fines, as a peaceful form of political protest. The concept of civil disobedience evolved from the idea that there are laws of the state that don't secure citizens. This concept evolved over a long period of time and was grasped from different types of cultures. The act of civil disobedience was most effective in the twentieth…

Words 696 - Pages 3

Civil Disobedience: A Breach Of Law

Background Since Thoreau introduced the term ‘civil disobedience’, it has been the guideline of many resistance movements and an important mechanism for social change (Brownlee, Kimberley 2013). According to John Rawls, ‘civil disobedience is a public, non-violent and conscientious breach of law…’ (Rawls 1971). But this definition raises many questions. Given that ‘civil disobedience’ is defined as ‘a breach of law’, how can we tell acts of civil disobedience from ‘ordinary’ illegal acts, if not impossible…

Words 1358 - Pages 6

Civil Disobedience In America

Joseph Raz, John Rawls, and Martin Luther King’s interpretations of civil disobedience. Civil disobedience is the active, professed refusal to obey certain laws or commands of a government; it is a symbolic violation of the law, rather than a rejection of the system as a whole. I shall argue that the protestors in Ferguson, Baltimore and other places where riots have emerged, do not have a duty to obey the law; civil disobedience is justified among the individuals protesting against police brutality…

Words 784 - Pages 4

Civil Disobedience Effectiveness

opposed. When carried out correctly, civil disobedience is a peaceful and effective tool available to the populace. In perfect execution, no other tool is as effective for overturning…

Words 796 - Pages 4

The Justness Of Civil Disobedience

Civil disobedience is nonviolent resistance manifested by an active, perceived refusal to obey certain laws or commands of a government. It involves the symbolic violation of a particular law and not a rejection of an entire system. Individuals that engage in civil disobedience often than not found themselves on the wrong end of the law. It is because, those in power feel threatened by such acts and feel the need to enforce the law at all cost. It has led to the branding of a civil disobedient individual…

Words 1220 - Pages 5

Thoreau's Civil Disobedience

To history, civil disobedience is the driving force that is integral to keeping a free society free. It is in civil disobedience that we find the keys to social change. From Thoreau's Civil Disobedience, one of the first intellectual writings supporting the idea, to the Black Lives Matter movement, and the Women's March on DC after President Trump's inauguration, civil disobedience is found as a prominent theme, a theme that keeps government as the tool to serve the will of the common many, rather…

Words 629 - Pages 3

Civil Disobedience Good Or Bad

Civil disobedience is the act of opposing a law one sees as unjust by peaceful measures rather than reacting in a violent manner. Doing this allows for more pacifistic resolutions to social conflicts and leads to a better social order, positively impacting a society. While some may see being disobedient to the government as wrong, it is better than desiring to harm people for the sake of civil liberties. For example, Rosa Parks and Martin Luther King Jr. were able to use peaceful measures such…

Words 505 - Pages 3

Gandhi's Role In Civil Disobedience

Change, in many cases, is a good thing. Without it our society would never advance - not technologically, socially or economically. The word disobedience often has a negative connotation to it, but disobedience is what brings about these changes that allow our society to move forward. Mahatma Gandhi, a well known name worldwide, was one of the most disobedient individuals in global history. He broke many of the laws that were enforced in British India and was imprisoned. Gandhi did not incite violence…

Words 676 - Pages 3

The Benefits Of Civil Disobedience

Throughout the course of history one group's go against another's. Civil Disobedience is a necessary moral obligation we need to protest the unjust, such as Dr.KIng did for equality, without going to extremes, such as Gandhi did by not rioting in order to gain India's independence. Why? What would drive a human to go against others of its own kind. Imagine your daughter running up to you with red, hot tears asking why she cant go to the new playground built right down the street, because the Jim…

Words 395 - Pages 2

Woolward's Luncheontte, By Martin Luther King Jr.

Civil disobedience is opposing a law that one considers unjust. Martin Luther King Jr. practiced civil disobedience during the Montgomery bus riots when Rosa Parks was arrested for not giving up her seat to a white man. Civil disobedience can also be seen as free speech without the speech part. Civil disobedience positively affects a society when it is demonstrated through non-violent activities. Take for example Greensboro, North Carolina college students who sat at the Woolward's Luncheonette…

Words 609 - Pages 3