The generalization test require that there must be a reason behind every action The Walmart case did not have any positive reason behind their fraudulent action and the way they cover up the bribery case. Indeed they made a lot of profit throughout all those business stores that were opened in Mexico. Walmart action did not have any ethical ideology at all except the pure desire to be profitable. “An action is unethical if generalizing the action is inconsistent with the possibility that everyone who performs the action achieves its purpose. “In the Walmart case the corollary3 fail. According to Hooker “reason require that we choose the action that maximizes total net utility. If the action have a mean it will be rational. In the Walmart case
