Essay about warrens court

Submitted By Legaleagle89
Words: 628
Pages: 3
Open Document
Criminal Procedure
Supreme Court cases effect on police work

The Warren Court where Earl Warren served as Chief Justice was the Supreme Court of the United States between 1953 and 1969. The 1960s were a challenging time in the United States. America had a major concern of the Civil Rights movement that demanded and needed change. Police work and law enforcement was imbedded with individuals who took the law in their own hands based off their social and personal views. Innocent men and woman were arrested daily because of some police’s higher authority they thought they had. Supreme Court cases Miranda v. Arizona and Brown vs. Mississippi made substantial influence for the better in police work and procedure.

Miranda v. Arizona, 384 U.S. 436 (1966), was a landmark decision of the United States Supreme Court. The Court concluded that remittable responses made in reference to questioning of the accused criminal in police supervision or detention will be permissible at court proceeding on the condition that the prosecution can prove that the defendant was informed of the right to consult with an attorney before and during questioning and of the right against self-incrimination prior to questioning by police, and that the defendant not only understood these rights, but voluntarily waived them. This had a major impact on law enforcement in the United States, which is known as the Miranda rights. The statement of, ““You have the right to remain silent. Anything you say can and will be used against you in a court of law. You have a right to an attorney. If you cannot afford an attorney, one will be appointed for you” is the regular routine police process to make certain that suspects were notified of their rights. When law enforcement reads the suspect their Miranda rights its purpose is to make sure the accused has full knowledge of their rights under the U.S. Constitution.
Brown v. Mississippi was a historic landmark case decided by the United States Supreme Court. This case was the precedent and deciding factor when ruling that a defendant’s confessions, when extorted by police officer will not be used as evidence because it goes against citizen’s due process rights. Due process is a constitutional right which assures citizens their entitlement to fair legal proceedings. You have the right and opportunity to be heard and protection from unjust unreasonable legal actions. Citizens have the right to life, liberty and property. The case Brown v. Mississippi started on March 30, 1934 when Raymond Stuart was murdered. The accused which were arrested
Show More

Related Documents: Essay about warrens court

Argumentative Essay: Warren Court And The 4th Amendment

Gian Gualco-Nelson Warren Court and the 4th Amendment “[T]he right of the people to be secure in their persons, houses, papers, and effects, against unreasonable searches and seizures, shall not be violated, and no Warrants shall issue, but upon probable cause, supported by Oath or affirmation, and particularly describing the place to be searched, and the persons or things to be seized.” Justices on the Supreme Court of the United States are employed to analyze and answer controversial questions…

Words 3492 - Pages 14

What Is Earl Warren's Legacy

Chief Justice Earl Warren (1891-1974) Background: Earl Warren was raised in a Conservative Californian household and attended Berkley Law School. In his early years he worked at the firm Robinson and Robinson, before eventually serving in WWI. After his short lived period of glory during the war, Warren returned to California and began his long career of public service. Warren clerked for the Judiciary Committee beginning in 1919 and eventually became the Deputy District Attorney of Alameda…

Words 1074 - Pages 5

What Is Earl Warren's Role In Criminal Justice

for a Supreme Court Justice? Most Americans would think of judicial background, knowledge of the Constitution, and the ability to win others over with their speaking abilities. Earl Warren had none of these things. He earned only a C-average in law school and had no judicial experience prior to becoming the Chief Supreme Court Justice. He wasn’t charismatic, and he was not well versed in Constitutional rights. However, he is widely considered one of the most influential Supreme Court justices in history…

Words 607 - Pages 3

Chief Justice Earl Warren

Before Chief Justice Earl Warren was appointed Chief Justice, he accomplished significant feats as the Governor of California, and served three consecutive terms of office from 1943–1953. He was the only person in history to ever be elected for three consecutive terms as Governor. In his early years, he served as the District Attorney of California from 1925–1939 and the Attorney General of California from 1939-1943. In his time as a District Attorney, Warren earned himself a reputation for being…

Words 2184 - Pages 9

Miranda Vs Arizona Essay

Miranda v. Arizona Another signature case that impacted and transformed police practices nationwide was the case of Miranda v. Arizona seen by the Warren Court. On March 13, 1963 police arrested Ernesto Miranda who was linked to the kidnapping and rape of some 18-year-old woman 10 days earlier. After being identified through a police lineup officers aggressively integrated Mr. Miranda. However, the police officers failed to inform Miranda of his Fifth Amendment right which protects against self-incrimination…

Words 433 - Pages 2

BAUTISTA INNA WARREN BURGER Essay

Chief Justice Warren Burger Warren Burger, born September 17, 1907, accomplished many things throughout his career. His legal career held many accomplishments such as working in nominations, being appointed Assistant Attorney General, in charge of the Civil Division of the Justice Department, and later becoming Chief Justice. His court accomplished many things although being conservative, delivering multiple transformative decisions on controversial matters. Gradually, Warren Burger became very active in Republican politics…

Words 353 - Pages 2

Justice In The Crucible

characters John Proctor, Mary Warren, and Reverend John Hale seek righteousness, and exhibit powerlessness…

Words 1254 - Pages 6

13th Amendment Dbq

not able to vote, move freely, be employed, or own property (Fleischman 82). Major disputes between freedmen and employers were to be addressed only by the local courts (Fleischman, 106). Decades after the ratification of the Fourteenth Amendment, a case regarding racial segregation and inequality was finally heard in the Supreme Court. In Plessy v. Ferguson (1896), Plessy—a man who was 1/8 black — argued that that the Separate Car Act that required him to sit in a sperate railway car was a violation…

Words 1532 - Pages 7

Earl Warren Accomplishments

Chief Justice Earl Warren was a man of many talents. He was an Army Veteran, Governor of California, Attorney General, and eventually served on the Supreme Court as Chief Justice. All of the roles that he filled throughout his life shaped him into a man that could, would and did change the American way in the late 50’s and 60’s. The Chief Justice Earl Warren was a legal scholar who interpreted the Constitution as a living document that needs to be understood in the context of modern time. His way…

Words 525 - Pages 3

Examples Of Mary Warren In The Crucible

witchcraft, in reality they were really accusing their neighbors out of self-protection. If Mary Warren did not accuse others out of self-protection, she herself would have been accused because she was a part of Abigail Williams’s group who conjured spirits in the woods. Mary Warren was motivated by self-protection when she told John Proctor that Elizabeth Proctor was accused. That made it so Mary Warren wouldn’t get whipped by John Proctor and he…

Words 980 - Pages 4