Individuals who isolate themselves from their communities have a direct correlation to the failure of language. It is not however solely on individuals that languages that directly correlates to languages collapse, but also generalization of language. “The generality of the language does not objectify it, but seals it in its subjectivity.” (5) This oversimplification makes it impossible to create a successful correlation between a reader’s idiosyncratic experiences and author’s idiosyncratic experiences, thus rendering a connection or understanding between the two – impossible. In order to battle this generalization, we must utilize precision. Proclaiming that there are two kinds of precision, particular and polarizing. Berry proceeds to elaborate on how particular precision is in the speech of people with similar knowledge of place, history, or profession. This is akin to jargon, making reference to direct subjects, descriptions, or professional language. After Berry’s tirade of how this form of precision is also “community speech.” This “mysterious” and ultimately undefined term is in reference to the unconsciously taught and learned manner of speaking that points to things visible by eyesight or in one’s memory. Because of its designative nature, community speech must be precise. (5) The second precision is the “precision that comes of tension”, this tension exists between statements and prepared contexts, or within a single statement, between conflicting feelings or ideas. Berry uses Robert Herrick’s line “Out of the world he must, who once came in…” as the ideal example of such tensions. (6) This final form of precision is not only accessible to public speech, but community speech as