One sentenced to death, two others sentenced to life in prison. Despite obvious holes in the evidence presented and the bias accusations, Damien Echols, Jason Baldwin and Jessie Misskelley were charged with the murder of three eight year old boys. With evidence based primarily on a false confession, cultural discrimination and even to extremes of satanic panic, they were found guilty. Could the courts possibly make these decisions without having completely sound evidence? Certainly they would base their accusations on physical evidence, not stereotypes and rumors. However, the events that took place throughout the trials of the West Memphis Three were perfect examples of history repeating itself. When the word was out that children had been murdered in a possible cult fashion, events similar to the Salem …show more content…
She said he knew Damien, and that he said he was a friend. There was no solid reason to bring Jessie in for interrogation, but “at this rather desperate point in their nearly month-old investigation, the police were ready to overlook a few difficulties presented by their story.” Jessie was in special education classes and struggled with school. When he was in the ninth grade, just before he dropped out at the age of 16, he still had the skills of a fourth grader. When he got angry or frustrated he would pull his own hair out and bite himself. Jessie was considered mildly mentally