This is the Environmental Protection and Biodiversity Conservation Act (EPBC) (1999). Under the EPBC it is illegal to kill, injure and/or interfere with cetaceans (whales/dolphins/porpoises) in the Australian Whale Sanctuary (AWS) which spans from three nautical miles from the shore to the boundary of Australia’s Exclusive Economic Zone. Penalties for breaching this Act reach up to fines of $110 000 and two years imprisonment. Offences relating to cetaceans also apply to Australian citizens outside overseas and in international waters. The EPBC also sets out cetacean recovery plans, whose effectiveness is evident in the increasing whale population each year. The EPBC is very effective in preventing whaling inside Australia’s borders as it rules it illegal. The hefty penalties for breaching the EPBC are also quite effective in preventing whaling, as they act as deterrents for possible …show more content…
Australia was a whaling nation until the 1970s when there was an enormous push by NGOs and the public to cease whaling practises. This push ultimately lead to Australia adopting an anti-whaling policy in 1979. On 30th June 2014, the International Fund for Animal Welfare (IFAW), along with other international anti-whaling NGOs, wrote a letter to Prime Minister Tony Abbott urging him to bring up the issue of whaling with Japanese Prime Minister Shinzo Abe during his visit to Australia on 7th-10th July 2014. This letter was sent in the wake of Japan announcing that they will be continuing their ‘scientific whaling’ in 2015. Although the NGOs’ request was not heeded, their letter and the bad publicity from Abbott’s not bringing up the subject reinforced the seriousness of the issue and the need for governments to respect the legal system and its