What Are The Arguments Against Spanish Conquests

Words: 1602
Pages: 7

In the tumultuous era spanning the late 15th to early 16th centuries, a profound shift in global dynamics unfolded as European powers ventured into uncharted territories, driven by a potent combination of ambition, greed, and religious zeal. This period witnessed the emergence of Spain as a formidable colonial power, propelled by a fervent belief in divine entitlement to conquer and subjugate distant lands. The Spanish, armed with religious doctrines and royal decrees, embarked on a quest for domination that would reverberate across continents, shaping the course of history and sparking intense opposition from various quarters. Throughout the late 15th and early 16th centuries, the Spanish justified their colonial conquests through religious …show more content…
This numbness causes the Spanish to lose sight of what is just, and de Las Casas goes as far as to say that “because the Spaniards have now lost all fear of God and of the King, they have ceased to know right from wrong. Because among so many and such different nations they have committed and continue to commit so many acts of cruelty, such terrible ravages, massacres, destructions, exterminations, thefts, violences and tyrannies of all kinds that all the things we have related are as nothing by comparison” (de Las Casas). de Las Casas focuses on using words such as “ravages,” “massacres,” “destructions,” “exterminations,” “thefts,” “violences,” and “tyrannies” to portray just how brutal these conquests were– so brutal that the Spanish lost sight of any moral compass they may have had. Though a Spaniard himself– and a religious one at that– de Las Casas found the Spanish’s religious justification for conquest to be abused and the violence they caused