The mood it expresses is that of near despair about the future of man, and the warning is that unless the course of history changes, men all over the world will lose their most human qualities, will become soulless automatons, and will not even be aware of it. The mood of hopelessness about the future of man is in marked contrast to one of the most fundamental features of Western thought: the faith in human progress and in man’s capacity to create a world of justice and peace. This hope has its roots in Greek and in Roman thinking, as well as in the Messianic concept of the Old Testament prophets” (Animal …show more content…
George Orwell was more of a writing style for a third-person point of view. He made the themes come to life and the tones known. Animal farm was more of an imaginary setting. Nineteen-Eighty Four was more of a dark, hidden kind of setting. All of the conflicts in these two books all deal with how Orwell over came all the people he dealt with. Orwell did overcome all of the freighting things that he said in these books by explain it through all of the characters. George Orwell was the type of person to not get into an argument with because he had a different way of life. His books illustrated the true meaning of everything that he went through. Orwell’s concentration over himself set him apart from the world. All of his books are manly alike because they are all characters basically about his life just in a plot twist. George Orwell’s book, Animal Farm, made his pain come to life, what his hardships were and what really caused them. The frightening things he would say about the characters but explaining his life through them makes his work more magical then it already