One norm I would suggest is setting clear expectations for participation. In the video, several members seem disengaged or distracted, leading to ineffective communication. By establishing norms that encourage active participation, such as speaking up when one has something to contribute or using features like the "raise hand" function in virtual meetings, the group can ensure that everyone's input is heard and valued. Another norm could be to encourage concise and focused communication. The video demonstrates instances of rambling and off-topic discussions, which can hinder productivity. By agreeing to keep contributions brief and relevant, the group can stay on track and make better use of their time.
2. What is the difference between a'smart' Why would you suggest these norms? How could the group enforce it? …show more content…
Without clear expectations for participation, some members may dominate the conversation while others remain silent, leading to a lack of diverse perspectives. Enforcing these norms could involve discussing and agreeing upon them collectively at the beginning of each meeting or project. The group could appoint a facilitator responsible for gently reminding members to adhere to the established norms and redirecting the conversation if it veers off course. Additionally, periodic reflections on the group's communication dynamics can help reinforce adherence to the norms.
3. What is the difference between a'smart' and a'smart' What roles would you suggest to the group to facilitate more effective group communication? Explain why these roles make sense for this