The farmers of the western front of Pennsylvania felt very strongly about the new tax. The farmers grew accustomed to distilling their surplus grain and corn into whiskey. In these regions, whiskey was so popular it served as a medium of exchange. Whiskey was both easier to transport and sell, which is why the tax directly impacted the farmers. In response to the tax, farmers resisted paying by attacking. At first, they used the method of tarring and feathering federal revenue officers. Tarring and feathering was a method of humiliation for revenge. In July 1794, five hundred mean attacked and burned the home of the tax inspector.
In response to the rebellious act, …show more content…
Two rebels were convicted of treason, though pardoned by the President. Due to the collapse of the rebellion, the federal government was able to prove it could keep order, being that it was a local rebellion. The suppression of the Whiskey Rebellion was widely approved. The suppression demonstrated that the new national government had what it took to suppress violent resistance to its laws. Because of this, the Whiskey Rebellion is generally viewed as a success for Washington’s administration. However, after the rebellion ended, the whiskey tax still remained difficult to collect and many westerners continued to refuse to pay the