In his essay, Peter Funt effectively argues that the transition to the digital age is undermining individuals' ability to preserve and cherish memories. Through a combination of evidence, reasoning, and stylistic elements, Funt constructs a compelling case that resonates with his audience.
Firstly, Funt relies on evidence and examples to support his claims. He begins by highlighting the longstanding tradition of saving physical mementos, such as ticket stubs, photographs, and handwritten letters, to preserve memories. By mentioning specific instances, like the Babe Ruth ticket stub from the 1932 World Series, Funt demonstrates the emotional and historical significance attached to these physical artifacts. This evidence appeals to readers' nostalgia and reinforces the idea that tangible memories hold a special place in people's hearts.…show more content… He shares his own experience of sifting through his mother's physical archives after her passing, emphasizing the emotional value of tangible keepsakes. Additionally, Funt contrasts his generation's penchant for collecting physical memorabilia with the digital habits of younger individuals, like his children. These anecdotes add a personal touch to the essay, allowing readers to connect with the author's perspective on memory preservation in the digital age.
In terms of reasoning, Funt employs logical arguments to underscore the drawbacks of relying solely on digital means to document memories. He draws attention to the sensory richness of physical objects, noting that they evoke emotional triggers and facilitate stronger memory recall. By referencing research on memory access and recognition, Funt makes a compelling case for the superiority of tangible memories over their digital counterparts. This logical appeal reinforces the idea that physical mementos offer a more authentic and fulfilling way to reminisce about the
