Whose Head Is The Farmer Using Analysis

The human population is ever growing. Hand in hand with this growing population new human settlements have come up and industries have been set up to fulfill the basic needs. New means of agriculture are adopted by using fertilizers am pesticides to increase the productivity. All these and much more are practiced for comfortable living. In the bargain, wastes from domestic and industrial activities are dumped into the environment. Consequently, environmental pollution has reached an alarming level and the environment has suffered an irreparable damage. Solid, liquid and gas wastes from the industries; run off fertilizers and pesticides from the agricultural land; am domestic sewage from urban areas has reached a limit beyond disposal. Michael …show more content…
" ' whose head is the farmer using?' Berry asks in one of his essays. ' whose head is using the farmer?' " ( Pollan 381). Berry wrote this around 1980's, which is about 20 to 25 years ago. As we see that it has been this many years yet our system is still going the same way it was going years ago. Our problems are still the same. Berry had gone through the same frustrations as a farmer that I'd faced in my little plot of land. He learned that farmers, by necessity, must take a less utopian view of nature. Berry says you have a legitimate quarrel with nature when it comes to weeds and pests. He's willing to intervene in a way that most American nature writers are not. Berry's argument for active, humane stewardship of land struck as a value system that could use. It's a line that urges you to connect the dots between two realms—the farm, and the plate—that can seem very far apart. We must link our eating, in other words, to the way our food is grown. There is power, too, in growing and cooking your own food. The questions that arise as you grow or cook will lead to new questions—handle meat while it is still the muscle of an animal, say, and your are much more prone to wondering about that animal. Or, out shopping, what does it mean when something's "grass-fed" or "pastured"? He's saying you have political power in your every day actions. When you decide what you're going to eat, what you're …show more content…
Both do provide a reason and their assumptions and also ways of dealing with such system. Local farmers and local food economies represent much the same sort of pre-problem solution–elegant, low-tech and redundant. But the logic of industry, apparently ineluctable, has other ideas, ideas that not only leave our centralized food system undisturbed but also imperil its most promising, and safer, alternatives. Agriculture is not crop production as popular belief holds - it's the production of food and fiber from the world's land and waters. Without agriculture it is not possible to have our society. Agriculture is the foundation of civilization and any stable economy. And these industrial Agribusiness culture is trying to destroy this system for all of us. We may think we don't have any type of power or say in this but we have to remember that their business runs because of us consumer not the other way around. Are we going to take a charge or let them take a charge and make our food in to such a

Show More

Essay on Walden Chapter 1-3 Research Report

Supply Chain Management and New Zealand Essay

Role Of Microfinance In Nepal

wesfarmers coopertion Essay

Azotobacter Case Study

Research Paper

Whole Foods Paper

Designer's Role And Internshipment: An Introduction To Ms. Rinku Kaicker

Profit: Grocery Store and John Thanassoulis Page Essay

Silent Spring - Rachel Carson Essay