As a consequence, right from birth, a kid is condemned to live below the poverty line. This too is not by choice. The social mores are vague, and not only that, the line between the right, the wrong, and good is too thin to see. Why would a parent send their child to work in order to pay off a debt? And the child has no say in the matter. No one asks them to choose between going to school and breadwinning for the family. Being born in a poor family would mean little if the government performed its duties, but in most cases it is non-committal (Ortiz-Ospina &Roser, 2018). The legislation against such corruption is not only loose, but also totally …show more content…
It is of note that varied degrees of child labor have existed since ancient times, but it is during the industrial revolution when it became commercialized. Inadvertently, the industry that saw scores of children end up in labor is the same one that reduced these numbers as a result of technological advancement and automation. During the great depression activism against child labor received a boost since many adults became unemployed and the easy way out of the predicament was to relieve the children. Strong government legislation has seen to it that every child acquires basic education, and that anyone below 14 years cannot work. This notwithstanding, progress has not been made in most Sub-Saharan countries and in the rapidly industrializing countries like India (Ortiz-Ospina &Roser,