Understanding the social context for work and learning contains many variables. Life experiences, level of education, age, ethnicity and language, gender and …show more content…
HRM is known to negate employees that may have mutual interests in one company with employees in another organization. HRM’s primary function, to some critiques, is to ensure there is minimum compliance within organizations. Some critiques say a “company’s products (e.g. cigarettes) or use of natural resources (e.g. clear cut forestry), and might argue that all HRM does is ensure workers’ compliance in these “harmful” company activities” (Spencer, B., & Kelly, J. (2013). Understanding the Human Resource Management/Corporation Connection. In An Introduction Work and Learning (p.2). Toronto: Thompson Educational Publishing). Some criticisms with HRM also include; involving employees in company undertakings, the purpose of HRM supports disparaging activity such as “most work in modern society is dehumanizing, that the competitiveness of modern organization’s leads to the development of less fulfilling social relationships” (Spencer, B., & Kelly, J. (2013). Understanding the Human Resource Management/Corporation Connection. In An Introduction Work and Learning (p.3). Toronto: Thompson Educational Publishing). HRM policies are impacted by internal and external pressures. Internal impacts include organizational objectives and financial strategies while external pressures include economic and social contexts. In order for HRM to be successful it requires