Why Is Mary Surratt Guilty

Words: 379
Pages: 2
Open Document
She’s Guilty! Mary Surratt is guilty and should have been executed because she lied to the police and helped kill the president. One reason she is guilty is because she lied to the police and this is why. According to the text “mary lied about knowing Paine.” “Before God, sir, I do not know this man and have never seen him an did not hire him to dig my gutters. It was my silly lie”(Source 2). This shows she lied to the police about knowing Paine to make it look like he was trying to hide from the police after Lincoln's murder. An example from the text is “Weichmann told the detectives that John Surratt was not home but in Canada and offered to help them with the investigation, Mary Surratt claimed not to know where her son was”(Source
Show More

Related Documents: Why Is Mary Surratt Guilty

Why Is Mary Surratt Guilty

Why Mary Surratt was guilty for co-conspiring against Abraham Lincoln Mary Surratt was guilty. She was guilty because she was a liar and was very untrustworthy. My first reason Surratt was guilty was that she worked with John Wilkes Booth. I know this because in source one it said She overheard a conversation between Lewis Powell and John Wilkes Booth. She might not have told anyone of the conversation because she might not have wanted anybody to know that she was working only as the kidnapping…

Words 324 - Pages 2

Mary Surratt Research Paper

Mary Surratt should have been executed, My reasoning for this is that Mary helped during the assassination on a lot of different subjects for example, she supplied the guns for the assassination, Surratt had a frequent visitor, An actor named John Wilkes Booth which was the killer of president Abraham Lincoln. Returning back to the topic of Surratt supplying the guns for the assassination those guns were later used by John to kill lincoln. Another reason why Mary Surratt is guilty is that her son…

Words 232 - Pages 1

Mary Surratt's Assassination

Mary Surratt and Lincoln's assassination Mary Surratt shouldn't have been executed. Mary Surratt shouldn’t have been executed because there isn't any physical evidence to prove she was guilty or innocent. Mary Surratt shouldn't have been executed because she only knew of the kidnap. It says in paragraph ten, it’s possible Mary knew of the kidnapping but not the plan to kill Lincoln. This explains that she only had known of the kidnap not the assassination. In paragraph five it states that…

Words 303 - Pages 2

Mary Surratt's Cruel Punishment

Mary Surratt’s sentence was a very cruel punishment for such a small thought. She thought she could get away with thinking she could be in on kidnap president Abraham Lincoln. She thought her and the others could of gotten a lesser sentence if they kept her alive a little bit longer they would of had more information and she and a lot of others would still be alive. She was in on kidnapping president Abraham Lincoln which should of had some punishment. She never even did it so she should have…

Words 798 - Pages 4

Mary and the Three Johns Essay

The name, Mary Surratt does not usually come to mind when thinking about the assassination of Abraham Lincoln, yet it should. Mary Surratt came from a middle-class family of Southern sympathizers, though to this day, the extent of her own personal involvement with the Confederacy remains unclear. Mary’s ownership of the Surratt Tavern and a boardinghouse along with the loyalty that she and her son, John Jr., gave to the infamous, John Wilkes Booth, and her willingness to play a key role in the…

Words 1205 - Pages 5