In these sections, Yang also does a great job in demonstrating the reasons of making assumptions clearly and explaining how he deals with potential issues related to the assumptions. In the dynamic model, Yang states several crucial benefits of making strong assumptions of a finite horizon and sequential moves, such as the unique of dynamic . In particular, Yang explains clearly how his assumptions are supplement to each other. The assumption of finite horizon and sequential moves eliminate the cooperative equilibrium and strengthen the validity the non-contractibility of dynamic innovation decisions assumption. In the static model, Yang claims that advantage of assuming linear contracts between handset makers and Qualcomm is to simplify the computation. In particular, Yang also points out several related downsides. For example, this assumption leads to inefficiency because of double marginalization. To address this concern, Yang conduct robustness analyze to show that these effect are small compared to investment effects and could be …show more content…
Because of its high dependence on Qualcomm chipsets, HTC is a natural choice for this counterfactual simulation. Thus, the Qualcomm-HTC merger allows Qualcomm and HTC to jointly make innovation decisions. In particular, Yang decomposes the effects of vertical integration into the investment effects and price effects and claims that the investment effects dominate the price effects. Based on the counterfactual simulation results, Yang summarizes how the vertical integration affects the whole industry, such as increasing the innovation of both upstream and downstream firms and increasing consumer surplus and total surplus. In the end of empirical analysis, Yang includes two main robustness checks. The first check considers Qualcomm’s royalty income and the second check considers the effect of additional handset