Young Goodman Brown

Words: 418
Pages: 2

Psychoanalytical Criticism is definitely a valid and useful tool for interpreting Nathaniel Hawthorne’s “Young Goodman Brown”. Furthermore, the reason it is a valid method for analyzing this story, in particular, is because understanding the feelings and opinions of Hawthorne allow for the reader to achieve a better level of understanding for the text. As stated in Bedford/St. Martin's “Critical Approaches” overview, “Psychoanalytic criticism written before 1950 tended to psychoanalyze the individual author” (Bedford 4). Moreover, in order to understand the meaning of the story, you must understand what message the author was trying to convey. In the case of Nathaniel Hawthorne's Young Goodman Brown, Hawthorne was making a comparison between himself and Goodman Brown. …show more content…
Hawthorne, like Goodman Brown, was distraught over the fact that his ancestors had committed such atrocities in the past. In fact, the vile actions of Goodman Brown’s family are very similar to that of Hawthorne's ancestors. In the story the Devil is explaining to Goodman Brown how he used to know his parents, “I helped your grandfather, the constable when he lashed the Quaker woman so smartly through the streets of Salem. And it was I that brought your father a pitch-pine knot, kindled at my own hearth, to set fire to an Indian village, in King Philip's War. They were my good friends, both; and many a pleasant walk have we had along this path, and returned merrily after midnight” (Hawthorne 2). This allows the reader to gain a better understanding of the struggle of Goodman Brown throughout the story, and therefore, have a better understanding of the story