Young Thug Trial

Words: 744
Pages: 3

In recent years, the Young Thug indictment has brought attention to the controversial use of rap lyrics as evidence in criminal trials. Young Thug's case sparked a debate about the implications of such tactics, particularly for Black artists and rappers. The indictment raised questions about whether rap lyrics should be considered as forms of confessions or artistic expressions, and it highlighted concerns about the stereotypes and prejudices against minority communities. In this essay, we will explore how the use of rap lyrics as evidence in criminal trials affects the perception of Black artists and rappers in the music industry.

The debate over using rap lyrics as evidence in trials hinges on whether the lyrics are taken too literally. Many artists, like McKinley Phipps, argue that rap songs are mostly exaggerated or made up. Phipps, who had his own lyrics used against him in court, says, "over 99% of the artists that are writing these songs are either highly exaggerated or downright fiction." This view is backed up by research showing that prosecutors often
…show more content…
They argue that rap often discusses violence and crime because those are the experiences some artists face. They think using these lyrics helps to understand where the artist is coming from and why they might be involved in crime. However, rap is more than just words; it's a form of art. Artists use metaphors and storytelling to express themselves, and their lyrics aren't always meant to be taken literally. Using rap lyrics as evidence without considering their artistic meaning can reinforce stereotypes about Black artists and their communities. Additionally, it can shift focus away from addressing real issues like poverty and racism, which contribute to crime. So, while rap lyrics can provide insight into an artist's life, they shouldn't be used as proof of guilt without looking at the bigger