The debate over using rap lyrics as evidence in trials hinges on whether the lyrics are taken too literally. Many artists, like McKinley Phipps, argue that rap songs are mostly exaggerated or made up. Phipps, who had his own lyrics used against him in court, says, "over 99% of the artists that are writing these songs are either highly exaggerated or downright fiction." This view is backed up by research showing that prosecutors often …show more content…
They argue that rap often discusses violence and crime because those are the experiences some artists face. They think using these lyrics helps to understand where the artist is coming from and why they might be involved in crime. However, rap is more than just words; it's a form of art. Artists use metaphors and storytelling to express themselves, and their lyrics aren't always meant to be taken literally. Using rap lyrics as evidence without considering their artistic meaning can reinforce stereotypes about Black artists and their communities. Additionally, it can shift focus away from addressing real issues like poverty and racism, which contribute to crime. So, while rap lyrics can provide insight into an artist's life, they shouldn't be used as proof of guilt without looking at the bigger