12 Angry Men Rhetorical Analysis

Words: 182
Pages: 1

Many of the jurors got heated and got into arguments with other jurors and what juror twelve said and how he reacted to the situation affected how the outcome of the situation ended. For example going back to when juror twelve redirected the conversation from everyone yelling at juror eight at once to his idea of let everyone say what they want one at a time so juror eight doesn’t feel bombarded with all the people talking at once. All the jurors agree that this idea is very fair and the foreman has everyone talk one at a time around the table. If conversations were brought into the juror’s personal lives he would bring it back to the facts and if the facts are logical. He never really impacted anyone emotionally throughout the novel but he