8th Amendment Death Penalty

Words: 465
Pages: 2

The U.S. Supreme Court has been going back and forth between whether or not, using the death penalty is allowed. While the eighth amendment has a ban on cruel and unusual punishment, there are ways to go about it with the jury and how the death penalty can be carried out. The death penalty shouldn't be allowed, but instead, use different punishments such as torture for certain crimes. There is a risk of executing innocent people. Since the death penalty is so final, there is nothing you can do if you find out they are innocent. “A study by Columbia University Law School found that two thirds of all capital trials contained serious errors” and “for every 8.3 people executed, we have found one person on death row who never should have been convicted” …show more content…
Hanging is the most traditional method of execution, but even that has its problems. “If the drop is too short, there will be a slow and agonizing death by strangulation. If the drop is too long, the head will be torn off” (The Case Against the Death Penalty). Other methods include the firing squad, electrocution, the gas chamber and finally lethal injection, which is the latest one. Although modern technology improved and they found better ways to deal with the execution, things did go wrong and they could find themselves torturing the people who were only supposed to get the death penalty, which should be quick and easy. Some people could say that if the crime is big enough, they might just want to skip torture and just sentence them to death right away. If they do get sentenced to death right away, they might lose their chance to prove their innocence. Now, even if these people are on death row and are going to be sentenced, there is no harm in the right to a trial. You don't have to rule out them having the death penalty, just make sure that everything is fair and