Essay on Against Euthanasia

Submitted By Celerrry
Words: 923
Pages: 4
Open Document
Celeny Cruz
Professor Connell
English 1005
1 May 2014
Against Euthanasia

As she lies there, holding back her tears, the doctor says, “ There’s nothing we can do, I’m sorry.” But is there really nothing he can do? Ever since euthanasia was introduced, it seems as though doctors have stopped trying there best to save their patients. Even though people don’t want to live the pain, euthanasia should be illegal. Euthanasia was first approved for people who are terminally ill and ask for it. Then they stretched it to people who can’t be cured or who have really bad disabilities. They then started to euthanize people who were depressed and wanted to die. “It is hard to be certain a patient was really dying in many cases. Many doctors have had patients who they thought were hopeless for recovery.” Doctors are starting to use euthanasia as an excuse. Some people have been euthanized although they had the chance to get better. It’s not fair to the patient and it’s definitely not fair to the patient’s family. I mean, if you’re not sure if someone can get better, why kill him or her? Doctors have stopped trying to save some of their patients. “If a physician withholds maximum efforts from patients he considers hopelessly ill, he will unavoidably withhold maximum effort from the occasional patient who could have been saved.” In other words, if a physician doesn’t give their all to save a patient who is hopelessly ill, then they’re not giving their all to save that one in a million patient who could’ve made it. And if you ask me, that’s pretty sick. They should be doing all they can to save all their patients, not giving up before they even try. The only state in the U.S. that allows euthanasia is Oregon. They call it “The Oregon Death,” and the law allows doctors to prescribe lethal medications to patients who have terminal illnesses and have been given 6 months to live. There are people who beat the odds and live longer than expected. Plus, if someone is given 6 months to live, shouldn’t they live those months to the fullest? Jonathan H. Pincus wrote a letter saying, “Many patients who could’ve been allowed to die are alive and doing well because of some new advance in therapeutics which occurred during the course of their illness.” It just takes some time. What if they euthanize someone who has been given 6 months to live and about 2 months later they find a cure to their illness? It’s simply not fair. In the first 9 years that “The Oregon Death” law was passed, 456 patients got lethal prescriptions. 292 of the 456 patients killed themselves with the medicine. That’s more than half! Those 292 patients equaled 15% of all deaths in Oregon. It just amazes me how a state can allow doctors to kill 15% of their population. Although the doctors only gave the patient the prescription and the patient did the rest, it is still the doctor’s fault because they shouldn’t have the patient the prescription. In the Netherlands, they allow doctors to prescribe medication for suicide. Their law is nothing like Oregon’s, they do not require a terminal illness, they only require “intolerable suffering” meaning unbearable pain. It’s unbelievable. Usually when someone is in pain they’re given some sort of anesthesia to numb the pain but no, the Netherlands just kills them. 1.7% of the Netherlands annual deaths are by euthanasia asked for by the patients, 0.1% is by euthanasia for the right reason and 0.4% are of patients who do not request euthanasia but are suffering intolerable pain so they’re killed.
Show More

Related Documents: Essay on Against Euthanasia

Ethical Arguments Against Euthanasia

Ethics & Euthanasia Introduction The Hippocratic Oath states that no doctor of medicine will give deadly medicine to any on if asked, nor suggest any such counsel, this is part of their moral and ethical obligations as trusted medical professional, and is a standard measure of care. Euthanasia in Greek means easy death, and is the act of painlessly killing a patient suffering from an incurable and painful disease or in an irreversible coma. Therefor that reason is why Euthanasia is not an acceptable…

Words 1377 - Pages 6

Ethical Arguments Against Euthanasia

The Subject of Euthanasia is a controversial topic raising many religious legal social and ethical concerns. Depending on the Circumstances euthanasia is regarded as manslaughter and murder with a maximum penalty of up to life imprisonment. The suicide Act 1961 decriminalised and made the act of suicide legal. In the second part of the act it defines 'assisted suicide' this is when a person takes their own life, with help from another. This act also stated that for an offence complicity in another…

Words 709 - Pages 3

Ethical Argument Against Euthanasia

One of the most debatable arguments about euthanasia is the ethical dilemma this action represents for the patient, the family and the doctors. Robert Cordover, an Australian marine biologist who suffered from Motor Neuron Disease was one of the many advocates and petitioners of euthanasia, as a form of pain relief. In a video recorded in the living room of his house, Nica; Cordover’s wife, reads out loud his petition to the Australian government to accept his plea and allow him to terminate his…

Words 744 - Pages 3

Bill Pesch's Arguments Against Euthanasia

their special moral duties an unconditional obligation never to kill, and that it is for this reason that they may not participate in euthanasia. An article, written by Bill Pesch about his argument against euthanasia specifically said that physicians have a sworn ethical duty to protect life. Given the fact that he is an American. Thus, his point of view against euthanasia is mostly about the American physicians. He said that almost all Americans physicians take the ancient Hippocratic oath as they begin…

Words 385 - Pages 2

Kylie Monaghan's Argument Against Euthanasia

Monaghan’s desperate campaign for passing legislation on euthanasia, David and Catherine Birnie’s abhorrent murders and Martin Luther King Jr’s reprehensible assassination are various instances which prove the extent of unethicality in these injustices which undermine and devalue humanity. Ladies and gentlemen, it is through the strenuous campaign for euthanasia led by Kylie Monaghan…

Words 1056 - Pages 5

Peter Kavanagh's Arguments Against Euthanasia

Euthanasia. A word which here means, “The painless killing of a patient suffering from an incurable and painful disease or in an irreversible coma.” The practice is illegal in most countries. Yet, the demand is still there. This begs the question, Why? One would be forced to slowly and painfully deteriorate whilst their family watched on the .02% chance of recovery. Conversely, in Lennie’s case He would have either been killed by the rest of the town or, if he and George had decided to run there…

Words 356 - Pages 2

Exit International's Argument Against Euthanasia

would be to let it die peacefully and make the decision for your pet to end its suffering. How is it that legally we have the right to make this decision for our pets but not for our loved ones or ourselves? Surely it’s obvious that forcing someone against their will to die slowly and in intolerable pain rather than allowing them to die quickly and peacefully is cruel and inhumane. In a recent poll conducted by Melbourne University 86% of the Australian public agree that those suffering an appalling…

Words 1026 - Pages 5

Natural Law Argument Against Euthanasia

Natural law theory has exerted the most enduring influence on the argument against Euthanasia, but people shall argue that in doing so it has made an unwitting accommodation with utilitarian principles. This is ironic because utilitarianism is pragmatic, calculative and inherently concerned with the short term rather than with the eternal, whereas natural law is committed to a deep metaphysical engagement with the eternal. A problem with natural law is its anti-democratic…

Words 846 - Pages 4

Ethical Arguments Against Euthanasia

lines typed of page 5 does not make a 5 page paper. In this research paper I am going to write about euthanasia as a right to choose, how can I identify and clarify the problem, what are the most common ethical solution which have been offered for the problem and defending the solution that I think is best. One of the most controversial and debating topic in today's society is euthanasia. It is not just a medical ethical problem, it also has philosophical, legal, religious and political dimensions…

Words 1399 - Pages 6

Assisted Dying Arguments Against Euthanasia

giving adequate reasons why it should be made legal in the U.K. In doing this the essay will include; the definition of assisted killing and what the law says concerning it in the U.K, the reason why assisted killing should be made legal, critics against assisted dying and the criteria’s and safeguard for making assisted dying legal in the U.K. Assisted dying is when a terminally ill person, deliberately or intentionally decides to end his or her…

Words 979 - Pages 4