Wood perceives revolutionary radicalism as the will of Americans as a whole to be liberated from England. He emphasises more on general oppression …show more content…
She highlights more of how the American Revolution glossed over more important, historically radical idea, such as race relations, gender equality, and new societal changes. She writes, “Seventeenth-century English revolutionaries toppled a king and embraced startling, leveling and millennial ideas. Eighteenth-century French revolutionaries went so far as to abolish slavery and to consider the rights of women as citizens of the republic. And in early nineteenth-century Peru, and anticolonial revolution produced the impulse to include Native Americans as “Peruvians.”In the light of such events, how are we to understand Wood’s repeated emphasis on the radicalism of the American case?...” With this statement, Smith points out the radicalism of other revolutions which occurred in the same general time period. All of the other revolutions she lists have more ‘radical’ additions to the revolutionary changes, not just a change in allegiances, such as the American Revolution. They all embrace more progressive ideas, which in turn lead to more socially equal societies in the countries listed. Later on in her article, Smith highlights another contradiction she has to Wood’s view of revolutionary American radicalism. “If there was something radical about the era, it seems it could not be